I posted this word (consubstantiaity) and its definition to show that science does indeed recognize what we've been talking about. As usual, science has invented a new word to describe an old idea. Which in one sense is a good thing as it strips away all the old red flags and irrational emotionalisms attached to that old idea. For instance, science did this with "sympathetic vibration" by relabeling it "entanglement" - making it acceptable to work with. They did the same with relabeling "psychism" to "remote viewing" thus rendering the subject "worthy" of their investigations.
Keely relabeled an old concept when he used the term "neutral center" to signify the Source of all motion (all things and all non-things). Keely was very interested in deriving (rotary) motion in his machines. Because the neutral center is so important to Keely's science we've been studying it which has led to so much chit-chat about God, void, zero point, spirit, manifestation, etc.
Fortunately or unfortunately depending on where one's perspective is, most people have misunderstood (presumed erroneously) we've been talking religion, cultism, touchy-feely nonsense. When in actuality we've been studying the veritable Source of ALL motion and energy harnessable by science. As an old Coors beer (brewed at the source of water high in the Rockies) commerical said: "All others beers (energy sources) are downstream beers (energy sources)...."
|
