 |
       |
|
|
|
|
| Become an SVP lifetime member SVPMembership |
 |
| The Do-It-Yourself Unincorporated Business Trust |
|
Topic: Dale Pond
Collected Articles Section: Testing, Testing Table of Contents to this Topic |
|
We've been building and testing HHO cells for some time. While we are not a "credentialed" testing facility our numbers and results are meaningful. We are not yet ready to publish our reports yet but I thought I'd mention a few items to tweak interest. We tested a number of commercially available units and not one produced the quantity of HHO claimed for it even though they all did produce HHO. No tests were done to establish improvement (or not) in actual road mileage. So we began inventing our own designs. We built a testing unit on the bench mimicing the electrical system of a vehicle. We developed a cell that is easily opened and changed out with different electrodes, chemicals and solutions or whatever. We can run a lot of tests in a short time. Our two successful units (built under contract) produced in live road tests 29% and 13% mileage improvements. Other units failed due to a number of issues including but not limited to leakage, over heating, too much electrolyte, too little electrolyte, electrode destruction, etc. Eliminating those parameters that hinder and enhancing those that work will result in a successful unit. We have learned a lot about this complex process - not so much from the theoretical chemistry and "physics" but more from actual build-it-and-test-it hands-on testing - kind of like Edison and his 600 tries at the light bulb. We know this process works (at times) and it is only a matter of sorting the unknowns into the known pile. We are pursuing our research and development and when we are prepared to present a full and verifiable data set we will do the YouTube thingie. PS: This (electric water dissociation) is not just about simple electro-chemical actions/reactions. Check out http://www.cifa-icef.org/piccardi.html |
| See Also: |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
