 |
       |
|
|
|
|
| In court? Need assistance? Jurisdictionary |
 |
| Your Own Credit Repair Business |
|
4th Circuit Court of Appeals, 19695704.html "If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognize the undisputed power of the jAlan Scheflin and Jon Van Dyke6199.html "The arguments for opposing the nullification instruction are, in our view, defiAlan Scheflin and Jon Van Dyke, 198010769.html "If juries were restricted to finding facts, cases with no disputed factual issuAlexander Hamilton, 18042322.html Alexander Hamilton (1804): Jurors should acquit even against the judge's instruc Alexander Hamilton, acting as defense counsel in a seditious libel case, said: "Constitution of Maryland5597.html "In the trial of all criminal cases, the Jury shall be the Judges of Law, as welD. C. Circuit Court of Appeals, 19725941.html The jury has an "unreviewable and irreversible power... to acquit in disregard oElliot's Debates, 17884447.html "If a juror accepts as the law that which the judge states then that juror has aIndiana Constitution, 19706756.html "In all criminal cases whatsoever, the jury shall have the right to determine th John Adams, who became the second U.S. President, in 1771 said of the juror: "it John Jay, first Chief Justice, U.S. Supreme Court, in Georgia v. Brailsford, 1 "Every jury in the land is tampered with and falsely instructed by the judge wheLysander Spooner, 18525366.html "For more than six hundred-years--that is, since Magna Carta, in 1215, theLysander Spooner, 18526539.html "In a representative government ... there is no absurdity or contradiction, norNew York Supreme Court Justice Kent, 18039433.html New York Supreme Court Justice Kent (1803): "The true criterion of a legal powerOliver Wendell Holmes, 192010502.html "The jury has the power to bring a verdict in the teeth of both the law and fact Samuel Chase, Supreme Court Justice and signer of the Declaration of IndependencSteven E. Barkan, 198311173.html "Jury acquittals in the colonial, abolitionist, and postbellum eras of the Unite "Within six years after the Constitution was established, the right of the jury, "It is universally conceded that a verdict of acquittal, although rendered again " ... it is a matter of common observation, that judges and lawyers, even the mo "But, as the experience of history shows, it cannot be assumed that judges willTheophilius Parsons, 18064287.html Theophilus Parsons," a leading supporter of the Constitution of the United StateThomas Jefferson, 17893990.html Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Thomas Paine, 1789: "I consider trial by jury aWilliam Kunstler, 19884615.html "...Unless the jury can exercise its community conscience role, our judicial sysYale Law Journal, 19646927.html "It is useful to distinguish between the jury's right to decide questions of lawYale Law Journal, 19647355.html "Underlying the conception of the jury as a bulwark against the unjust use of goYale Law Journal, 19647745.html "Since natural law was thought to be accessible to the ordinary man, the theory "...[T]he right of the jury to decide questions of law was widely recognized in "During the first third of the nineteenth century,...judges frequently charged j |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
